Heritage Foundation analyst Baker Spring is out with a new memo, analyzing the threat posed by a potential missile launch from North Korea—and the potential response. Spring insists the threat underscores the importance of a comprehensive national missile defense system, and that North Korea should not be allowed to engage in “threatening, unannounced missile launches.” He suggests that a pre-emptive strike could be justified but only if we can determine that Pyongyang topped the missile with a Nuke. Short of that, he would prefer to engage our missile defense system. However, he warns, the current umbrella is not as robust as it could be. He recollects the first Bush Administration’s Global Protection Against Limited Strikes, which he feels had more teeth but which Clinton scuttled. (We ignored the date error in Spring’s article.)
DARPA Changing Directors Again in Third Recent Shuffle
Jan. 21, 2021
The Biden administration is reportedly tapping Stefanie Tompkins to run the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, spurring the third leadership change at the secretive Pentagon organization since January 2020. Defense One first reported Tompkins’s “pre-decisional” appointment to the post on Jan. 19. The White House did not respond to a…