Most people understand cyberspace from a user’s perspective, but few can make sense of the laws and regulations surrounding the military’s newest man-made domain, said Lt. Gen. Michael Basla, vice commander of Air Force Space Command, Friday. Nor can they understand the intricacies of operating in the virtual world, Basla told attendees of AFA’s CyberFutures Conference in National Harbor, Md. He said this forces cyber officials to make physical analogies about a cognitive domain. For example, he said, it’s like comparing the Air Force’s multiple networks to a single maintenance squadron being responsible for 10 different types of aircraft. While such analogies may get the point across, they also are “insufficient,” said Basla. “We need to culturally update the thinking and understanding of the cyber domain” to fall more in line with the understanding of the air domain, he said. For example, most airmen know the difference between an F-22 and an F-16; they also should be more conversant about cyberspace. Basla suggested rewarding airmen who increase their cyber knowledge or certification, similar to paying airmen to learn a foreign language.
The U.S. supports “a stronger and more capable” European defense, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III said during an Oct. 22 press conference in Brussels—but that defense should not duplicate the functions and capabilities of the NATO alliance.